20 Empowering Quotes About Positive Thinking

Do you feel that life has been unfair to you? Do you feel that people and situations have let you down? Dont hover on these bad thoughts. Instead, embrace the power of positive thinking.  Here are a few quotes that might pep you up. Nelson MandelaI learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear. Denis WaitleyWhen you are in the valley, keep your goal firmly in view and you will get the renewed energy to continue the climb. Abraham LincolnMost folks are about as happy as they make up their mind to be. Thomas EdisonMany of lifes failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. Dr. Joyce BrothersSuccess is a state of mind. If you want success, start thinking of yourself as a success. Mahatma GandhiA man is but the product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes. Norman Vincent PealeChange your thoughts and you change your world. Dale CarnegieIf we think happy thoughts, we will be happy. If we think miserable thoughts, we will be miserable. HenleyI am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul. Henry FordWhether you think that you can, or that you cant, you are usually right. Winston ChurchillA pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty. Oprah WinfreyThink like a queen. A queen is not afraid to fail. Failure is another steppingstone to greatness. T. S. EliotKeep true, never be ashamed of doing right; decide on what you think is right and stick to it. Henri MatisseThere are always flowers for those who want to see them. Robert H. SchullerIt takes but one positive thought when given a chance to survive and thrive to overpower an entire army of negative thoughts. Bill MeyerEvery thought is a seed. If you plant crab apples, dont count on harvesting Golden Delicious. Ellen GlasgowNo life is so hard that you cant make it easier by the way you take it. Hubert HumphreyOh, my friend, its not what they take away from you that counts. Its what you do with what you have left. Susan LongacreReach for the stars, even if you have to stand on a cactus. Emory AustinSome days there wont be a song in your heart. Sing anyway.

Failure of Three Regulation in Financial Crisis Essay

Since the year 2008, many countries had been suffered from a financial crisis or Hamburger crisis, because of the mistaken policy, complex financial system etc. which cause a severe shock to the financial system globally. From this impact, the federal government of United State of America (USA) and other countries had injected a large fund for retrieving this situation significantly. Therefore, it can be explained that understanding the main causes of the financial issue can assist each country to clarify problems. The purpose of this essay is to elucidate regulatory failure in 3 major types: first, misguided intervention in the U.S. second, failure of financial risk management, next, the lack of transparency regulation in private and†¦show more content†¦Also, the US GDP increased nearly 25 percent during 2006 to 2007. During the lowest interest rate, people used credit to own a house, credit cards or car. The economic system was shifted to a high level as same as the inc reasing of household mortgage debt has rose to 75 percent during 5 years (2000-2005). It can be explained that US household received more chances to own a houses, housing market had been promoted considerably. It seems to be good news for global financial market, especially US government, because of the positive result which was responded by homebuyer and investor hastily. On the other hand, hiding some information such as a long term effect from interest rate, the ability to pay debt, and the fluctuation of housing market, most borrowers and investors could not know both sides information (It is called ‘Moral Hazard’). Banks and non-banks needed to gain more profit neither borrowers could not pay a debt nor had a financial problem , and US government only concerned about the increasing of economic system and GDP rate. Even though, banks would be suffered from the increasing number of poor-credit that were unable to pay a debt (sub-prime borrowers or NINJA (No Job, No income, assets), fortunately banks could sell a list of sub-prime borrowers to Fannie Mae Freddie Mac or non-banks. Unluckily, the housing demand could not stand at the peak for long time. A housing demand and aShow MoreRelatedThe Crisis Of The United States1305 Words   |  6 PagesAs a result of the crisis, there were many different impacts on both the U.S. and global economy and one of them being buyouts and acquisitions within the U.S. financial institutions. Just to name a few of the acquisitions and failures that occurred due to the crisis, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns were among the largest investment banks. â€Å"Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, Bear Stearns was bought by JP Morgan Chase and Merrill Lynch was bought by Bank of America.† (Chang, 14)Read MoreThe Financial Crisis : Deregulation Or Over Regulation?1175 Words   |  5 PagesThe Financial Crisis: Deregulation or Over-regulation? As evidenced by the plethora of explanations concerning it, the 2007-08 financial crisis that originated in the United-States is highly complex. The literature presents various causes, most of which can be placed on either side of a debate between government intervention and laissez-faire of market mechanisms. On one side, it is argued that financial actors are responsible for the crisis as a result of their use and distribution of complexRead MoreThe Impact Of Expansionary Monetary Policy During The Great Recession1720 Words   |  7 PagesDepression [1]. After eight years, global economies today continue to struggle to find sustainable recovery and robust growth. The crisis was a massive institutional failure that involved the bursting of the asset bubble, the collapse of the stock market, and the moribund employment rate among others. The crisis has since triggered economists, governments, and financial institutions to critically revisit their standard models and to question whe ther the understanding of the inflation-targeting frameworkRead MoreCorporate Governance For A Future Economic Crisis Essay1288 Words   |  6 Pages-Can corporate governance prevent a future economic crisis. Ten years ago, corporate governance was still in the concept stage. There wasn’t a lot of information about corporate governance. After some big corporate failure that hit the economy, it has become obvious that corporate governance matters. After the collapse of Enron,Wordcom,..a new regulation was born (Sarbanes Oxley).The law was implement to increase transparency and to promote integrity and accuracy inside the companies. UnfortunatelyRead MoreFactors Responsible For The Global Financial Crisis1430 Words   |  6 Pagesfactors responsible for the global financial crisis in 2008-09 which started in US and later spread across the world. By now, a lot of studies have been done on the global financial crisis of 2008. We explain briefly the role of the financial engineering which leads to combination of various financial securities, the actual risk of which is not clearly assessed and hence leading to the financial crisis. There were also some serious lapses in regulation and failure of the rating agencies in assessingRead MoreFinancial Crisis During 2008 Hit The Economy, People Panicked1261 Words   |  6 PagesAssignment 2 When the financial crisis during 2008 hit the economy, people panicked. In an attempt to stabilize the market, the government took action. The various actions taken in 2008 by the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Bank, as well as the new regulations proposed and implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, were generated to reduce and mitigate the systemic risk created by the Money Market Mutual Funds. These actions and regulations, as well as the systemicRead MoreThe Financial Crisis Of 2007-20091490 Words   |  6 PagesThe financial crisis of 2007-2009 resulted from a variety of external factors and market incentives, in combination with the housing price bubble in the United States. When high levels of bank and consumer leverage appeared, rising consumption caused increasingly risky lending, shown in the laxity in the standard of securities screening and riskier mortgages. As a consequence, the high default rate of these risky subprime mortgages inc urred the burst of the housing bubble and increased defaultsRead MoreGovernment Intervention And Laissez Faire Of Market Mechanisms1369 Words   |  6 Pages2007-08 financial crisis that originated in the United-States is highly complex. The literature presents various causes, most of which can be placed on either side of a debate between government intervention and laissez-faire of market mechanisms. On one side, it is argued that financial actors are responsible for the crisis as a result of their use and distribution of complex and risky financial products, and their irresponsible lending. On the other side, the arguments centre on policy failures, orRead MoreThe Reasons For European Sovereign Debt Crisis1437 Words   |  6 PagesAccording to the analysis above, the euro crisis could be partly ascribed to previous financial crisis in 2008. After deeply investigation, the failure could have a lot of thing to do with government regulation and management. The reasons for European sovereign debt crisis could categorized into two main issue; income and solvency problem as analyze above. Hence, this part will examine the failure of both private and public sectors from the angle of accounting. With the accounting aspect, the conceptRead MoreIntroduction: The financial sector has been hit badly by the financial crisis in 2008. The1600 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction: The financial sector has been hit badly by the financial crisis in 2008. The increased competition between banks induced executives to take excessive risk to maximize bank’s profit, as their performance compared to other competitors is measured by the revenues they achieve to financial institutions and its stock value (Kashyap, Rajan et al. 2008). Banks went into trouble especially after the expansion of mortgage finance and facilitating loans to homebuyers with the lowest possible

Internet Privacy Essay Thesis Example For Students

Internet Privacy Essay Thesis Internet Privacy: Is the Internet as safe as everyone says?As every generation comes they bring with them a new invention from cars to television to the telephone the basic existence of man, in my eyes, is to advance both technologically, thus making life better for us all and also scientifically. Man wants to know all we want to be able to answer all the questions out there as every day goes by we get closer and closer to answering some of our questions. Everyday new cures for diseases are found and also new diseases are discovered, new discoveries are made in various fields, at the same time however new problems are arising. Man in every era has depended on some form of tool to help him to his tasks whatever they may be, a tool to make things easier. This tool is technology; technology does not have to be the modern thoughts of computers. Technology is the science of technical processes in a wide, though related field of knowledge. That is the definition given by The New Lexicon Websters Dictionary of the English Language. So technology can be anything as long as it helps us advance. It can be anything like a plough to help a farmer, a television to help the media and the telephone to help us communicate. The latest technology of the 20th Century is the Internet and it has placed a great mark on our society. It is the new place to be where business can advance, people can interact worldwide at the click of a mouse and this has revolutionarily changed the world. In the world of the Internet there are millions of members worldwide and that means it is a very profitable arena. In an area where there is money there are criminals and that is where the modern criminals of the world are behind computer screens. They may be credible individuals in society and they could also be credible corporations and organizations that are finding a quick way to make money and by doing this they are breaking ethical rules of society (even though it is hard to determine the ethics of the internet) and one of these crimes is the violation of the privacy of others. I have logged on to the internet and have felt safe, like anyone should that logs on to the net, that I am the only one viewing my mail or cruising the net, I feel like I am the only one that knows where I have been and that no one is tracking me. After all the things I have just mentioned only happen in the movies, they are Enemy of the State type of things, and it could not possibly happen to you am I right? Wrong. By holding this thought one is including themselves in a large group of consumers, world-wide, who are unaware of the multitude of information they are placing on the World Wide Web, simply by using it as it was designed to be used. All it takes is a visit to any site to place personal information about yourself on the internet. (Buffalo University). The best way, at least for me, to understand the Internet is not to view it as a one way street but instead as a two-way road. The one way view of the internet is that it provides us with information and entertainment, this is what many people use the internet for and that is the one way view they maintain though it is not wrong there is more to it. That is where the two way view comes into effect while an individual is surfing the net the people that maintain the web sites are also getting information that information is on you. It is a two way street because you get what you want and they get what they want, which side gets the more information is very debatable, solely on the premise on how much you treasure your privacy. It is disturbing to know that one can be tracked all over the World Wide Web just from their mouse clicks. This may be happening to many of us, our browser alone gives as away simply. .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .postImageUrl , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:hover , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:visited , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:active { border:0!important; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:active , .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42 .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9a3342c5afe09f62494b9d0611b2ae42:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: English Is the Only Foreign Language Worth Learnin? Essay Just from our browser someone who wants to can find out could probably find out which computer you are coming from, what software and hardware you are using, details of the link you clicked on, and possibly even your email address (junkbusters.com) This is a lot of information about us that we may not want out there. Our browser is giving all this information out through cookies. A cookie is a unique identifier that a web server places on your computer: a serial number for you personally that can be used to retrieve your records from their databases. Its usually a string of random looking letters long enough to be unique (www.junkbusters.com). This is a very bad thing that destroys the founding of privacy if you cannot surf the Internet without half the consumer-retailing world knowing about, that is a very horrible thought. When I view a particular page that is of interest to me and I want to some more information on the products they offer I usually fill an on-site registration form, along with me so do many users of the Internet. By providing the information to the company I am under the assumption that they will send the information I need to me and that they are under an ethical code to respect my privacy. Well in the world of the Internet, and in this day and age ethics might as well be a dream. The forms we fill online may ask for basic information like my name, address, phone number and email address and maybe my personal interests, however the sad part is that all this information is most likely being gathered for marketing purposes. It is often sold to other interested parties willing to buy my information along with those of hundreds of others, so that they may push their products upon them. There are companies emerging over the Internet that can get almost any piece of information on you that you hold dear to your self. The Internet has unleashed a new beast, a beast that has no name but that has no respect for privacy. If tomorrow morning the United States Postal Service announced that all mail had to be sent in a clear envelope there would be a huge ruckus. That would involve everyone from a custodian to the president of a major organization; this is because we all have something that is private to us that we do not want strangers to know about. What is very disturbing is when it comes to protecting your privacy, banks and brokerage firms tend to squirm. By law they must record Social Security number, the marker that can unlock the data in all too many other accounts (Forbes pg. 187). If your money is not safe, if one knows how much money you have in this society then you are at a disadvantage. In this society I feel every thing is measured by the contents of your bank account, to achieve the dream many work hours and hours upon end to make ends meet and to have all their labors exposed to the whole world can be a very painful thing. While researching this paper I came across an interesting article done by MSNBC it was about a man named Glen Roberts who lives in Oil City which is in northwestern Pennsylvania. Mr. Roberts had obtained through legal means, thanks to the Internet and to be more specific the electronic Congressional Record to obtain the social security numbers of prominent members of the United States military. He then displayed these numbers on his site to display to the world how insecure the Internet was. This is not some secret military document that someone hacked into, and these are not the Pentagon Papers, Roberts said. This is information that is put into public libraries all across the country with taxpayer dollars (www. .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .postImageUrl , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:hover , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:visited , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:active { border:0!important; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:active , .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0608a003ddccc58cfe24ea756358346c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Why We Cant Wait By Martin Luther King Jr. Essaymsnbc.com). After reading the article on he MSNBC website I searched for Mr. Glen Roberts page and found it. From there I was able to discover the social security numbers of many prominent members in our society including. General Colin L. Powell whos social security number is 113-28-4024 and Bill Gates whos social security number is 539-60-5125. These were all available from his Internet address: http://www. glr.com/media After viewing the contents of this website I thought to my self if the numbers of prominent members of society are openly available to many then what would prevent the numbers of normal civilians from being available. Many experts agree that once you have the social security number of an individual you have the key to their whole life. No safeguards are being taken to adequately protected. The Internet in my opinion is a young domain and many are taking advantage of it by breaking strict moral and ethical values. To prove my point on how insecure the internet was and how the privacy of others were not being protected I took the liberty of finding out what information I could find on Mark Preut. He is my Debate coach and also American Government teacher, in one minute (I timed myself) I came up with was his address, phone number, map of the town he lived in. If I had looked on further I know I could have found more but then I would be contradicting my self on the matter of privacy. The Internet is a dangerous place we need to be careful. It is understandable that the founding fathers did not take into account the invention of the Internet let alone the computer. However they did believe in a sense of privacy that sense of privacy has not been applied by this government. To that matter it has not been applied to any other government which has control over events on the World Wide Web. It is a shame there is no little or no privacy in this new world created by man, the world known as cyberspace.

Response to Shakespeare Essay Example

Response to Shakespeare Essay I will take several points of the play into account, such as: individual characterisation; attitudes to life and love; and the fate, destiny, coincidence and the star-crossed side of events. By the end of this assignment, I hope I will have answered this question.To introduce the assignment, I am going to give my views on the play, before looking at each aspect of it in close detail:My first impression was that I thought there were several reasons as to why this is a good play, including the way it makes us think about the plot, and so in turn, how it makes us think about the real world outside it. For example, we see two young people (Romeo and Juliet) fall in love. This may make us impose questions about our own lives, such as where our own love lives are going, and if the reader is in a relationship, whether it has potential (perhaps like Romeo and Juliet could have had), or if it will never work out given foreseeable or unforeseeable circumstances (such as Romeo, with his suppose d fascination with Rosaline).The second impression I got from it was from Rosaline, another character in the play, as she helped us to get an insight into the life of Romeo. I personally doubt that he really did love Rosaline, and that he actually wanted to fantasise over a woman who he knew he cold never (realistically) have a relationship with. This could be vital for my assignment, because the attitudes to love between Romeo and Juliet could have killed them, in the sense that Romeo felt that he needed to immediately commit suicide when he saw the person he loved, dead.The final impression that I got was that the characters in the play seem as if they have their own different personalities. For example, Romeo is so easily led by his love life, but yet he never acts upon what he feels, by getting together with the woman Ay me, the sad hours seem long (i.i.160) in other words, he is depressed with his love and keeping it to himself, rather than telling the woman (Rosaline in this case). Juliet however is a lot different Conceit, more rich in matter than in words (ii.vi.30) in other words, she thinks that people would be better off if you acted upon your dreams, and made them into reality. This shows that these two characters had different attitudes to the same thing which shows that they had their own personalities.Overall, I am expecting this play to be quite fascinating and enjoyable. Romeo and Juliet is world renowned, and is generally recognised as being a brilliant play, with its author being one of the most famous writers in world history. On the offset, the plot and characters seem to be integrated together very well, to produce a well balanced and easy to understand play. Overall, I have high expectations of this play.To answer the question, I am firstly going to look at the fate, destiny, coincidence, and the star-crossed (Prologue.6) aspect of the play. I personally feel that fate, destiny, coincidence, and the star-crossed aspect, do play an i mportant part in the play.Here is a list of quotes regarding the fate and destiny side of events:* Give me my Romeo, and when I shall die,Take him and cut him out in little stars(iii.ii.20-21) Juliet here is saying that when she dies, she will take Romeo with him and they will be up with the stars together and eventually that did happen.* Then love devouring death(ii.vi.7) Romeo here is saying that their love will be departed because one, or both of them will die (like a vicar saying Till death us do part during a marriage service, meaning hopefully you wont part marriage until one of the couple die)* Too like the lightning, which doth cease to beEre one can say, it lightens(ii.ii.119-120) Here, Juliet is describing the love between her and Romeo as lightning, possibly because lightning will represent their powerful, and electric love. But also, lightning only lasts a few seconds, so maybe fate is telling us that their love wont last for very long.* That I must love a loathed enemy (i.v.140) She thinks fate has come upon her, because she thinks she must love him because it was meant to happen. She doesnt give herself the option to try and not love Romeo.I think coincidence and destiny had quite a lot to do with the plays events, although the characters themselves brought some of the events on. Coincidence, I feel had the largest part to play in the events that were to lead to the deaths, as far as the characters were concerned. For example, If Peter, the Capulets servant was to never ask Romeo I pray sir can you read? (i.i.57), Romeo would never have got invited to the Capulets party, the place where Romeo and Juliet were eventually going to meet for the first time.I think the star-crossed method also played an important role within the play. This is because the characters referred to the stars often, either in a good way, or in a bad way.From forth the fatal loins of these two foes,A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life (prologue.5-6)This quote in the prologue (the introduction) of the play basically tells us that the story was destined to take its course in the way it did, because the ill-fated couple were born lovers, destined to end up in disaster because thats what the stars would lead them to. I think this quote alone makes destiny a very important aspect of the play and question, because the prologue actually tells the story, and tells us what will happen in it. If you saw the prologue as Shakespeares truthful speech on what he wanted to happen, then destiny would have to be what killed Romeo and Juliet. However, if you saw the prologue as Shakespeares mystery element to the play (where it may or may not happen), then it may or may not be destinys fault that Romeo and Juliet died.I am now going to look at the conflict side of events. This is one of the main areas in which the dramatic mood and events was used to create the drama, by creating tension and mystery with the conflict. The most obvious way I can describe what I m ean by tension and mystery is the very first scene, involving the fiery character Tybalt. Basically, two members of the Capulet household, Sampson and Gregory, start taunting two members of the Montague family, Abraham and Balthasar. Basically, this brawl turns into a fight, which another character, Benvolio tries to stop. Eventually, Tybalt comes along, and as the fiery tempered character he is, starts to attack Benvolio. Tybalt laughs in the face of Benvolio, when he asks Tybalt to part these men with me (i.i.67), and immediately starts taunting Benvolio, saying, I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee (i.i.69). Eventually everyone started fighting. This shows that conflict was in the play from the startAlso, this makes all sorts of questions and thoughts run through the heads of people who havent read or seen the play. Who are these characters? What is their relationship with Romeo and Juliet like? How well do they know them or get on with them? Why did the Capulets and Montagues st art fighting? And the most important question of all what will this lead towards later in the play, as far as Romeo and Juliets deaths are concerned? We could also say this is the perfect start to Romeo and Juliet, as well as a very good conflict between the characters. This is because it makes us want to read on, to try and answer all these questions I have just raised. However, more importantly for us with this assignment, it gives a us an impressions as to what the fiery character Tybalt is like.Tybalt is one of the main characters, and in his own right partly responsible for Romeo and Juliets death. The story is very complicated, but basically, Tybalt kills Mercutio, Romeos close friend, and so Romeo kills Tybalt. This forces Prince Escalus to banish Romeo from Verona, because he had already warned the town not to fight any more as he was sick of the conflict between everyone. This caused all the following events, mainly Friar Lawrences plan for Romeo to return to Verona to col lect Juliet, so they could leave Verona together. But this plan went wrong, and as we know, it ended up unintentionally killing them instead. Because of this, we could blame Tybalt for their deaths. Although it seems Romeo was to blame for being banished, I see this as an attack of revenge, and not a regular fight. Benvolio thinks this tooBut by and by comes back to Romeo,Who had but newly entertained revenge (iii.i.173-174)In other words, Benvolio is saying that although it was a little harsh of Romeo to murder Tybalt (by entertaining revenge), it wasnt an act of murder, because Tybalt had done exactly the same thing as Romeo, only he murdered Romeos best friend.Im now going to talk about some other of the main characters who I think caused Romeo and Juliets deathFriar Lawrence: Although Friar Lawrence only directly influenced the deaths once; he does influence them quite a lot indirectly. He mainly acts upon what Romeo and Juliet are faced with, and tries to sort it out for them. For example, Friar Lawrence comes up with the plan for Juliet to pretend shes died of grief, because of Tybalts (her cousins) death.And, with wild looks, bid me devise some mean,To rid her from her second marriage (v.iii.239-240)Here, Friar Lawrence is basically explaining that Juliet came to him for help, so she could get out of marrying the man her parents wanted her to marry (Paris). This is why Friar Lawrence accidentally created all this chaos just to be a helping hand to her.The only direct effect he had could have been the worst one he could have made he married them. Although he wasnt sure a marriage between them would work, providing the fact that they were still teenagers, and also providing the fact that their families feuded, he still married them, because This alliance may so happy prove (ii.iii.91). Basically, he thought that if he did marry them, he would bring the two families together To turn your households rancour to pure love (ii.iii.92). I thought this was sli ghtly optimistic, but I personally think that if Romeo and Juliet want to be married, then thats all that counts, not what their families would think to it.Prince Escalus: The prince only caused one main event, but it turned out to be fatal. Im not entirely sure it would have changed things for the better if he had punished Romeo differently for causing Tybalts death, but never-the-less, it couldnt have turned out as worse as it with his punishment as banishment! Prince Escalus gave the wrong sentence to Romeo, by banishing him, as he said only two or three days before then that he would execute anyone who would fight again in VeronaIf you ever disturb our streets again,Your lives shall suffer the forfeit of the peace. (i.i.95-96)Basically, if anyone fights in the street again, then his or her life will suffer badly, because if they arent banishment, then they will get a death sentence. When he caught Romeo and Tybalt fighting, he decided to banish Romeo -Let Romeo hence in haste,El se, when hes found, that hour will be his last (iii.i.197-198)In other words, if hes ever seen in Verona again, he shall be executed. I cant help but think that if Tybalt hadnt caused that fight in the very first scene, Prince Escalus would have overlooked what happened, as he always had done before. This would mean Friar Lawrence wouldnt have come up with his ingenious plan, and perhaps things would have turned out for the better.The families (the Montagues and Capulets): I think that the families are to blame for everything! Capulet and Lady Capulet try persuading Juliet to marry someone she doesnt want to marry, even after her cousin (Tybalt) had just died! In the script, this doesnt seen so special, but if we put it into perspective, it will seem a lot different. If a 14-year-old girl today was suddenly told she had to marry someone, without even knowing about it until a few days before the ceremony, I dont think it would be well received by the girl, or by the general public. T he most overwhelming thing I saw was in the third act, just after Romeo had murdered Tybalt, whereby Lady Capulet, Tybalts relative, was bad-mouthing the Montagues instead of mourning Tybalts death!He is a kinsman to the Montague;Affection makes him false, he speaks not true (iii.i.179-180) (Referring to Tybalts death)This is really bad, because she is correctly blaming Romeo, but for the wrong reason. By this, I mean that no matter what Romeo would do, he would always lie and in this case, it would be his fault no matter what he had done! This seems as if she didnt care about her relatives death, and was more concerned about getting the Montague family into more trouble! Overall, this shows that the families cared more about feuding, than their childrens lives, so perhaps they could be to blame for that reason.Peter (a servant): The early scene with Peter was the best example of coincidence in the play. I believe coincidence ruins a play, because it wouldnt usually happen in real l ife, and therefore appears to be a flaw in the plot to me. I think this wasnt so much bad coincidence, but Shakespeare saw the flaw he would have, bringing the Capulet and Montague families together at a party, so he had to do something to get them to meet which would seem like no easy task. Basically, Peter couldnt read, but yet he had to post invitations to the people who the Capulet family invited. When he asks Romeo to read the letters, he responds by asking Romeo if he would go to the party to drink a glass or two of wine be not of the house of Montagues, I pray you come and crush a cup of wine (i.ii.81-83). This is quite well thought out in my opinion, because it seems like the situation is feasible, so perhaps using coincidence in this scene wasnt such a bad idea, and didnt seem like a flaw in the plot to me.Getting back to the point If Peter could have been able to read the letters, then Romeo would probably not have been invited to the Capulet party, and would probably no t met Juliet. This is why I think Peter could have caused their deaths. This concludes my character analysis.One final aspect I am going to look at is the time Shakespeare was writing. This can be explained easily. Basically, Shakespeares 16th century audiences would have thought differently to us as their beliefs were based upon a lack of scientific knowledge, and their day-to-day lives were affected by their lack of technology. For example, It was typical of feuds to run in families (i.e. with the Capulets and Montagues); it was typical of huge sword fights to occur in the streets (i.e. The Capulets and Montagues in a huge brawl in the first act); and finally, where we see popular holiday resorts such as the Caribbean as being exotic, Shakespeares audiences thought that Verona in Italy was an exotic setting. Basically, Shakespeares audiences thought incredibly different back then, and although it may explain some of the events that have happened, such as the fighting and feuding, it doesnt completely explain why Romeo and Juliet had to die in the play.To conclude, I will put all this evidence together and try to form a clear explanation, as to what exactly killed Romeo and Juliet. I think that destiny, coincidence and the star-crossed theme is concerned, could have killed Romeo and Juliet it all depends on how you look at it. If you took the fate idea in the Prologue (where it tells you of their deaths, as I explained earlier) seriously, then it would definitely be fates fault.As far as the characters are concerned, I think that almost every character has been integrated together in a particular way; to all somehow kill Romeo and Juliet. I dont think there is one (main) character in the play that didnt do something or another, to either directly or indirectly contribute to their deaths in some way.Conflict played a reasonably large part in their deaths. The constant fighting in the streets made Prince Escalus banish anyone who was to fight (i.e. Romeo when he killed Tybalt). The conflict then though was due to the family feuds, as the fights were mainly between the Capulets and Montagues. It is hard to say, but I dont think this caused their deaths, simply because they werent fought because of Romeo and Juliet.Overall, I couldnt say who or what killed Romeo and Juliet and be 100% sure of it, but I personally believe it was destiny. This reason may not seem justified as far as the actual play was concerned, but in the prologue, it tells of their deaths this was a really important part, if not the most important part of the playFrom forth the fatal loins of these two foes,A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life (prologue.5-6)Basically, we knew all along that they would die during the play, so we couldnt change what would happen to them it was destiny. Therefore, to answer the question, I dont think that the deaths of Romeo and Juliet could have been avoided. Response to Shakespeare Essay Example Response to Shakespeare Essay It is undoubtable that the play of King Lear is predominately of evil, which is ultimately overcome by the forces of good. There are many variations of evil depicted in this play among them are greed, violence, hatred, madness, betrayal, avarice and envy. The most prominent form of evil, and one of the earliest in the play, is greed. Gonerill, the oldest daughter, introduces this firstly after Lear stated that due to old age he was worn out and wanted to leave the affairs of his kingdom to younger strengths so that he might have time to prepare for death. To do this he divided his kingdom into three, and that each third would be a dowry, one for each of his three daughters, he then asks Gonerill how much she loves him. Gonerill, realising that because of Lears infirmity in old age, she would be well rewarded on giving the right answer, replies saying that she loves her father more than she can say and more than anything else including her own freedom: We will write a custom essay sample on Response to Shakespeare specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Response to Shakespeare specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Response to Shakespeare specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Dearer than eyesight, space, and liberty. (1.1.56) This answer is greatly exaggerated especially as she stated that she loves Lear more than life itself: No less than life (1.1.58) In her greed Gonerill would say anything to get what she wanted, which was as much as possible therefore she covered the lack of love with extravagant words. Lear accepting this answer as a true declaration of her love for him rewarded Gonerills greed with one third of his kingdom. On asking his second daughter, Regan, Lear is told that she is the same as her sister and so worth the same only that Gonerills answer came short of the love that she has for her father: I am made of that self mettle as my sister And price me at her worth. In my true heart I find she names the very deed of love; Only she comes too short, (1.1.69/72) Knowing that she would also get a third of the kingdom like her sister she declared that she hates all joys compared to the pleasure that she has in loving her father: That I profess Myself an enemy to all other joys (1.1.72/73) On hearing this from Regan, Lear is more than pleased and rewards Regans greed also, with a third of his kingdom equal to the third that he gave to Gonerill. Edmund the bastard son of Gloucester introduces another instance of greed in the play. Edmund was both greedy and envious of his older, legitimate brother, Edgar. Edmunds envy was due to the fact that his older brother was the legitimate son of Gloucester and therefore entitled to inherit the whole of Gloucesters estate upon his fathers death, while he would inherit nothing, thus the greed. Edmund would do anything to inherit the wealth including betray his own brother: Well then, Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land. Our fathers love is to the bastard Edmund Cordelia in fear of appearing greedy in the way her sisters did stated that she loved her father according to her duty as a daughter and no more: I love your majesty According to my bond, no more nor less. (1.1.91/93) You have begot me, bred me, loved me. I return those duties as are right fit, (1.1.96/97) This proclamation of Cordelias introduces two more evils into the play, the madness that Lear displays being one of them. This madness made him unable to distinguish that Gonerill and Regan were not speaking the truth about their profound love for him and that Cordelia loved him the most of all. Therefore when Cordelia spoke the truth about her love and said that she did not love him above all else, Lear became enraged and subsequently disowned his most favoured daughter, sharing the last third of his kingdom, which would have been her dowry, between Gonerill and Regan: Here I disclaim all my paternal care, Propinquity and property of blood, And as a stranger to my heart and me Hold thee from this forever. (1.1.113/116) With my two daughters dowers digest the third. Let pride, which she calls plainness, marry her. (1.1.128/129) He also presented the Duke of Albany and the Duke of Cornwall with a `coronet` between them along with the power that it retained: Beloved sons, be yours; which to confirm, This coronet between you. (1.1.138/139) Lears madness is also apparent when Kent, Lears most loyal and trusted friend, tried to intervene and spoke up for Cordelia saying quite literally that Lear was mad and needed saving from himself and that Gonerill and Regan had empty hearts and did not love their father like they claimed. Be Kent unmannerly When Lear is mad. What wouldst thou do, old man? (1.1.145/146) Thy youngest daughter does not love thee least, Nor are those empty-hearted whose low sounds Reverb no hollowness. (1.1.152/154) Lears anger grew and he turned on Kent showing us yet another evil, violence, threatening Kents life if he said more: Kent, on thy life, no more! (1.1.155) Continuing Kent explains that Lears threat means nothing because he would gladly give his life for that of his king and that he is only acting to ensure the kings own safety: My life I never held but as a pawn To wage against thine enemies; nor fear to lose it, Thy safety being motive. (1.1.156/158) Enraged all the more Lear chooses to `reward` Kents audacity with banishment from the kingdom allowing him five days to prepare to leave, but, if he remained in the kingdom on the sixth day he would be killed: Take thy reward. Five days we do allot thee for provision To shield thee from disasters of the world, And on the sixth to turn thy hated back Upon our kingdom. If on the tenth day following Thy banished trunk be found in our dominions The moment is thy death. (1.1.172/178) Shakespeare uses various techniques to capture the attention of his Elizabethan Audience and to keep them entertained, one of these is the expressive and imaginative language that he used especially in some of Lears speeches. He uses a very powerful speech when Lear realises that Gonerill has deceived him and does not truly love him: Hear, nature, hear! Dear goddess, Hear! Suspend thy purpose if thou didst intend To make this creature fruitful. Into her womb convey sterility, Dry up her organs of increase, And from her derogate body never spring A babe to honour her. If she must teem, Create her child of spleen, (1.4.272/278) Shakespeare uses repetition: Hear, nature, hear! Dear goddess, hear! To get the audiences attention, this technique is used throughout the play, most often when Lear is angered and trying to make something known, Lears speeches were among the most powerful and Shakespeare would have wanted their full attention during this time in the play. Another of Lears speeches used by Shakespeare depicts, well, the constant referral to the planets and gods by all of the characters in the play: For by the sacred radiance of the sun, The mysteries of Hecat and the night, By all the operation of the orbs From who we do exist, and cease to be, (1.1.109/112) This constant referral is another of the techniques used by Shakespeare to capture the attention of his audience. The Elizabethans would have had a general interest in the stars and planets as the telescope had been invented in the early 17th century and therefore it was now possible for them to be seen properly for the first time. Edmund also brings astronomy and astrology together during one of his speeches: Treachers by spherical predominance, drunkards, liars, And adulterers by an enforced obedience of planetary Influence. (1.2.123/125) My father compounded with my mother under the Dragons tail, and my nativity was under Ursa Major, (1.2.128/129) Shakespeare also used another topic of general interest to the Elizabethans; he makes a referral to disease. This was because during the Elizabethan era the bubonic plague was rife and as a result the playhouses often had to be shut down in order to stop the spread of the disease when someone with the plague had been there: Kill thy physician and thy fee bestow Upon the foul disease. (1.1.163/164) Among the various evils illustrated in the play of King Lear I believe that greed is not only the most prominent but also the most important to the complete work. Without the evil of greed Lear would never have expressed such anger and hatred at his daughters, Cordelia would never have been disinherited and finally killed and Kent, Lears most faithful friend would never have been banished. Thus many of the other evils in the play were introduced as a result of the greed, Lears madness also played an important part in this as his infirmity caused him to be unable to notice the truth about his daughters feelings for him. In addition to this, the language that was used by Shakespeare brought Lears speeches to life and to memade them all the more powerful.